THE PREVENTION OF FOOD ADULTERATION
ACT,
1954
(Act
No. 37 of 1954)
Preliminary
1. Short title, extent and
commencement
2. Definitions.
Central Committee for Food Standards and Central FOOD LABORATORY
3. The Central Committee for
Food Standards
3-A. Appointment of Secretary and
other staff
General Provisions as to Food
5. Prohibition of import of certain articles of food
6. Application of law relating to sea customs and powers of customs
officers
7. Prohibitions of manufacture, sale, etc. of certain articles of food
Analysis of Food
11. Procedure to be followed by Food Inspectors
12. Purchase may have food analysed
Miscellaneous
14. Manufacturers, distributors
and dealers to give warranty
14-A. Vendor to disclose the name,
etc. of the person from whom the article Of 'food was purchased
15. Notification of food
poisoning
16. Penalties
16-A. Power of Court to try cases
summarily
19. Defences, which may or may
not be allowed in prosecutions under this Act
20. Cognizance and trial of
offences
20-A. Power of Court to implead
manufacturers, etc.
21. Magistrate's power to impose
enhanced penalties
22. Protection of action taken
in good faith
22-A. Power of Central Government to
give directions
23. Power of the Central
Government to make rules
24. Power of the State
Government to make rules
THE PREVENTION OF FOOD ADULTERATION ACT, 1954
(Act No. 37 of
1954)
[29th September 1954]
An Act to make provision for the prevention of adulteration of food
Be it enacted by Parliament
in the Fifth Year of the Republic, of India as follow:
Preliminary
1. Short title, extent and commencement. -
(1) This Act may be called the Prevention of Food
Adulteration Act, 1954.
(2) It extends to the whole
of India 1[* * *]
(3) It shall come into force
on such date 2 as the Central Government may,
by notification in the official Gazette, appoint.
1. The words
“except the State of Jammu and Kashmir” omitted by the Act 41 of 197 1. Sec. 2
(w.e.f. 26tb January, 1972).
2. lst June,
1955; see notification No. S.R.O. 1085, dated 9th May 1955, Gazette of India,
Pt. 11 Sec. 3, P. 874. The Act has been extended to Dadra and Nagar Haveli by
Reg. 6 of 1963, Sec. 2 and Sch.1, to Pondicherry by Reg, 7 of 1963, Sec. 3 and
Sch. 1, to Goa, Daman and Diu by Reg. 11 of 1963, Sec, 3 and Schedule and to
Kohima and Mokokchung district in Nagaland by Act 24 of 1972, Sec. 2 (w.e. f.
1st April. 1973).
2. Definitions. -- In this
Act unless the context otherwise requires, --
1[(i) “Adulterant” means any material which is or could be employed for the purpose of adulteration;]
2[(i-a)] “Adulterated”—an
article of food shall be deemed to be adulterated---
(a) If the article sold by a vendor is not of the nature, substance or quality, demanded by the purchaser and is to his prejudice, or is not of the nature, substance or quality, which it purports or is, represented to be;
(b) If the article contains
any other substance which affect, or if the article is so processed as to
affect injuriously the nature, substance or quality thereof;
(c) If any inferior or
cheaper substance has been substituted wholly or in part for the article so as
to affect injuriously the nature substance or quality thereof;
(d) If any constituent of
the article has been wholly or in part abstracted so as to affect injuriously
the nature, substance or quality thereof.
(e) If the article has been
prepared, packed or kept under insanitary conditions whereby it has become
contaminated or injurious to health;
(f) If the article
consists wholly or in part of any filthy, putrid, 3[*
* *], rotten, decomposed or diseased animal or vegetable substance
or is insect-infested or is otherwise unfit for human consumption;
(g) If the article is
obtained from a diseased animal;
(h) If the article contains
any poisonous or other ingredient which renders it injurious to health:
(i) If the container of the
article is composed, whether wholly or in part, of any poisonous or deleterious
substance which renders its (contents injurious to health;
4[(j) If any colouring
matter, other than that prescribed in respect thereof is present in the
article, or if the amounts of the prescribed colouring matter which is present
in the article are not within the prescribed limits of variability;]
(k) If the article contains
any prohibited preservative or permitted preservative in excess of' the
prescribed limits;
5[(l) If the quality or
purity of the article falls below the prescribed standards or its constituents are
present in quantities not within the prescribed limits of variability but which
renders it injurious to health;]
(m) If the quality or purity of the article
falls below the prescribed standard or its constituents are present in
quantities not within the prescribed limits of variability but which does not
render it injurious to health:
Provided that, where the
quality or purity of the article, being a primary food has fallen below the
prescribed standards or its constituents are present in quantities not within
the prescribed limits of variability, in either case, solely due to natural
causes and beyond the control of human agency, then, such article shall not be
deemed to be adulterated within the meaning of this sub-clause.
Explanation. – Where two or more articles
of primary food are mixed together and the resultant article of food-
(a) Is stored, sold or distributed under a
name which denotes the ingredients thereof; and
(b) Is not injurious to health,
Then, such
resultant article shall not be deemed to be adulterated within the meaning of
this clause;
(ii) “Central Food Laboratory” means any
laboratory or institute established or specified under Sec. 4;
(iii) “Committee” means the Central Committee for Food Standards constituted under
Sec. 3;
(iv) “Director of the Central Food Laboratory”
means the person appointed by the Central Government may notification in the
Official Gazette as the Director of the Central Food Laboratory and includes
any person appointed by the Central Government in like manner to perform all or
any of the functions of the Director under this Act:
7[Provided that no person who
has any financial interest in the manufacture, import or sale of any article of
food shall be appointed to be a Director under this clause;]
8[(v)
“Food” means any article used as food or
drink for human consumption other than drugs and water and includes, -
(a) Any article, which ordinarily enters into,
or is used in the composition or preparation of, human food,
(b) Any flavouring matter or condiments, and
(c) Any other article which the Central
Government may, having regard to its use, nature, substance or quality declare,
may notification in the official Gazette, as food for the purposes of this
Act;]
8[(vi) “Food (Health) Authority” means the Director
of Medical and Health Services or the Chief Officer in-charge of health
administration in a State, by whatever designation he is known, and includes
any officer empowered by the Central Government or the State Government, by notification
in the Official Gazette, to exercise the powers and perform the duties of the Food (Health) Authority under this Act with respect to such
local area as may be specified in the notification;]
(vii) “Local area” means any area, whether urban
or rural, declared by 9[the Central
Government or the State Government] by notification the Official Gazette, to be
a local area for the purposes of this Act;
(viii) “Local authority” means in the case of:
(1) A local area which is-
(a) A municipality, the municipal board or
municipal corporation;
(b) A cantonment, the cantonment authority;
(c) A notified area, the notified committee;
(2) Any other area, such authority as may be
prescribed by 10[the Central Government
or the State Government] under this Act;
11[(viii-a) “Local (Health) Authority”, in relation to a
local area, means the officer appointed may the Central Government or the State
Government by notification in the Official Gazette, to be in-charge of' health
administration in such area with such designation as may be specified therein;
(Viii-b) “Manufacture”
includes any process incidental or ancillary to the manufacture of an article
of food;]
(ix) “Misbranded”-an article of food shall be
deemed to be, misbranded-
(a) If it is an imitation of, is a substitute
for, or resembles in a manner likely to deceive, another article of food under
the name of which it is sold, and is not plainly and conspicuously labelled so
as to indicate its true character;
(b) If it is falsely stated to be the product
of any place or country
(c) If’ it is sold by a name which belongs to
another article of food;
(d) If’ it is so coloured, flavored or coated,
powered or polished that the fact that the article damaged is concealed or if
the article is made to appear better or of greater value than it really is;
(e) If false claims are made for it upon the
label or otherwise;
(f) If, when sold in packages which have been
sealed or prepared by or at the instance of the manufacturer or producer and
which bear his name and address, the contents of each package are not
conspicuously and correctly stated on the outside there of within the limits of
variability prescribed under this Act:
(g) If the package containing it, or the label
on the package bears any statement, design of device regarding the ingredients
or the substances contained therein, which is false or misleading in
any material particular, or if the package is otherwise deceptive with
respect to its contents;
(h) If the package containing it or the label
on the package bears the name of a fictitious individual or company as the
manufacturer or producer of the article;
(i) If it purports to be, or is represented as being, for special dietarty uses, unless its label bears such information as may be prescribed concerning its vitamin, mineral, or other dietary properties in order sufficiently to inform its purchaser as to its value for such uses:
(j) If it contains any artificial flavouring,
artificial colouring or chemical preservative, without a declaratory label
stating that fact, or in contravention of the requirements of this Act or rules
made thereunder;
(k) If it is not labelled in accordance with
the requirements of this Act or rules made thereunder:
(x) “Package”
means a box, bottle, gasket, tin, barrel, case, receptacle, sack, bag, wrapper
or other thing in which an article of food is placed or packed;
(xi) “Premises” include any shop, stall or place
where any article of food is sold or manufactured or stored for sale:
(xii) “Prescribed” means prescribed by rules made
under this Act;
12[xii-a) “Primary food” means
any article of food, being a produce of agriculture or horticulture in its
natural form;]
(xiii) “Sale” with its grammatical and cognate expressions,
means the sale of any article of food, whether for cash or on credit or by way
of exchange and whether may wholesale or retail, for human consumption or use,
or for analysis, and includes an agreement for sale, an offer for sale, the
exposing for sale or having in possession for sale of any such article, and
includes also an attempt to sell any such article:
(xiv) “Sample” means a sample of any article of food
taken under the provisions of this Act or or any rules made thereunder:
(xv) The words “unwholesome” and “noxious” when
used in relation to an article of food mean respectively that the article is
harmful to health or repugnant to human use.
STATE
AMENDMENT
Maharashtra. - In Sec. 2 of the Prevention of' Food
Adulteration Act. 1954 (37of] 1954) to Cl. (VI) the following proviso shall be added
“Provided that the
Commissioner of Food and Drugs Administration Maharashtra State, appointed as
such by the State Government shall on the commencement of the Prevention of
Food Adulteration Maharashtra (Amendment) Act, 1969 (.XIII of 1970), be the
Food (Health) Authority in the State of Maharashtra.”13
In Cl. (viii). After
sub-clause (2), the following proviso shall be added, namely:
“Provided that 'local
authority' in the case of a local area in the State of Maharashtra, means such
authority or officer of the State Government as the State Government may, by
notification in the Official Gazette, appoint for the local area specified in
the notification.”
1. M.L. Karma V. New India Assurance Co., (1992) 2 S.C.C. 36 at p. 41; see also Life Insurance Corpn. Of India V. Manubhai
D. Shah. A.I.R. 1993 S.C. 17l at p. 176; Aslam Babala Desai V. State of
Maharashtra, A.I.R. 1993 S.C. I at pp. 11, 17.
2. Ins. by Act 34 of 1976, Sec. 2 (w.e.f. Ist. April, 1976).
3. Clause (f) renumbered as Cl. (i-a) by Sec. 2 ibid.
4. The word “disgusting” omitted by Sec. 2 ibid.
5. Subs. by Sec. 2 ibid, for the sub-clause (f) (w.e.f. Ist. April,
1976).
6. Subs. by ibid, for the sub-clause (i) (w.e.f. Ist. April, 1976).
7. Ins. by Act 34 of
l976, Sec.2 (w.e.f.Ist April, 1976)
8. Subs. by ibid.
9. Subs. by Act 49 of
1964. Sec. 2 for “the State Government” (w.e.f. Ist. March, 1965).
10. Ins. by Act 34 of 1976
Sec. 2 (w.e.f. Ist. April, 1976).
11. Subs. by Act 49 of 1964. Sec. 2 for “the State Government” (w.e.f.
Ist. March 1965.
12. Ins. by Act 34 of
1976. Sec. 2 (w.e.f. Ist. April, 1976).
13. Vide the Maharashtra
Act, 1970 (XIII of 1970), published in the Maharashtra Government Gazette.
Extraordinary, Pt. IV. No. 16 dated 12the. March, 1970).
CENTRAL COMMITTEE
FOR FOOD STANDARDS AND
CENTRAL FOOD
LABORATORY
3. The Central Committee
for Food Standards. -
(1) The Central Government
shall, as soon as may be after the commencement of this Act, constitute a
Committee called the Central Committee for Food Standards to advise the Central
Government and the State Governments on matters arising out of the
administration of this Act and to carry out the other functions assigned to it
under this Act.
(2) The Committee shall consist of the
following members, namely:
(a) The Director-General, Health Services, ex
offlcio, who shall be the Chairman:
1[(b)
The Director of' the Central Food Laboratory
or, in a case where more than one Central Food Laboratory is established, the
Directors of such Laboratories, ex officio;]
(c) Two experts nominated by the Central
Government;
2[(d)
One representative each of the
Departments of Food and Agriculture in the Central Ministry of Food and
Agriculture and one representative each of the Central Ministries of Commerce,
Defence, Industry and Supply and Railways, nominated by the Central
Government;]
(e) One representative each nominated by the
Government of each 3[* * *] State;
(f) Two representatives nominated by the
Central Government, to represent the, 4[Union
territories];
4[(g) One representative each, nominated by the Central Government, to
represent the agricultural, commercial and industrial interests;
(gg) Five representatives nominated by the
Central Government to represent the consumer’s interests, one of whom shall be
from the hotel industry;]
(h) One representative of the medical profession
nominated by the Indian Council of Medical Research;
5[(i) One representative nominated by the Indian Standards
Institution referred to in Cl. (e) of Sec. 2 of the Indian Standards
Institution (Certification Marks) Act, 1952 (36 of 1952)].
(3) The members of the Committee referred to in
Cls. (c), (d), (e), 6[7[(q), (gg),] (h),
and (i)] of sub- section (2) shall, unless their seats become vacant earlier by
resignation, death or otherwise, be entitled to hold office for three years and
shall be eligible for re-nomination.
(4) The functions of the Committee may be
exercised notwithstanding any vacancy therein.
(5) The Committee may appoint such and so many
sub-committees as it deems fit and may appoint to them persons who are not members
of the Committee to exercise such powers and perform such duties as may,
subject to such conditions, if any, as the Committee may impose, be delegated
to them by the Committee.
(6) The Committee, may, subject to the
previous approval of the Central Government, make byelaws for the purpose of
regulating its own procedure and the transaction of its business.
1. Subs. by Act 34 of-
1976. Sec.3 (w.e.f. Ist. April, 1976).
2. Subs. by Act 49 of-
1964. Sec. 3 (w.e.f. Ist. March. 1965).
3. The words and letters
“Part A State and Part B” omitted by the Adaptation of Laws (No.3) Order. 1956.
4. Subs. by ibid, for “Part C States”.
5. Ins. by Act 49 of 1964.
Sec. 3 (w.e. f. Ist March. 1965).
6. Subs. by Act 34 of
1976, Sec. 3, for Cl. (g) (w.e.f. Ist April, 1976).
7. Subs. by Act 49 of
1964 Sec. 3 for “(g) and (h)” (w.e.f. Ist March. 1965).
1[3-A. Appointment of Secretary and other staff. –
(1) The Central Government shall
appoint a Secretary to the Committee who shall, under the control and direction
of the Committee, exercise such powers and perform such duties as may be
prescribed or as may be delegated to him by the Committee.
(2) The Central Government shall provide the
Committee with such clerical and other staff as that Government considers
necessary.]
1. Ins. by Act 34 of
1976, Sec. 4 (w.e. f. 1st April, 1976).
1[(1) The Central Government
shall, by notification in the Official Gazette, establish one or more Central
Food Laboratory or Laboratories to carry out the functions entrusted to the
Central Food Laboratory by this Act or any rules made under this Act:
Provided that the Central
Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, also specify any
laboratory or institute as a Central Food Laboratory for the purposes of this
Act.]
(2) The Central Government may, after
consultation with the Committee, make rules prescribing-
2[(a) The functions of Central Food Laboratory and the local area or
areas within which such functions may be carried out;]
(b) The procedure for the submission to the
said Laboratory of samples of articles of food for analysis or tests, the forms
of the Laboratory's reports thereon and. the fees payable in respect of such
reports;
(c) Such other matters as may be necessary or
expedient to enable the said Laboratory to carry out its functions.
STATE
AMENDMENT
West Bengal. -To sub-section (1) of Sec. 4.
The following proviso shall be added, namely:
“Provided that the State Government
may with the prior approval of the Central Government, direct that the
functions of the Central Food Laboratory and the Director may be carried out in
West Bengal by such authority and such officer respectively, as may be
specified the State Government by notification in the Official Gazette and any
reference in I his Act to I he Central Food Laboratory or the Director shall
then be construed to mean such authority or officer, as the case may be”, 3
1. Subs.
by Sec. 5. Ibid. For sub-section (1) (w.e.f. I st April 1976).
2. Subs by Act 34 of 1976. Sec. 5, for,
Cl. (a).
3. Vide West Bengal Act. 42 of 1973.
Published in the Calcutta Gazette, Pt. III. No. 264. dated 29th
April, 1974 (w.e.f. 29th April, 1974).
GENERAL
PROVISIONS AS TO FOOD
5. Prohibition of import of certain articles of food. -No person shall import, into
India---
(i) Any adulterated food:
(ii) Any misbranded food:
(iii) Any article of food for the import of'
which a licence is prescribed, except in accordance with the conditions of the
licence: and
(iv) Any article of food in contravention of any
other provision of this Act or of any rule made thereunder.
6. Application of law relating to sea
customs and powers of Customs Officers. -
(1) The law for the time being in force
relating to sea customs and to goods, the import of which is prohibited by See.
18 of the Sea Customs Act, 1878 (8 of 1878) 1
shall, subject to the provisions of Sec. 16 of this Act, apply, in respect of
articles of food, the import of which is prohibited under Sec. 5 of this Act,
and officers of Customs and officers empowered under that Act to perform the
duties imposed thereby on a 2[Commissioner
of Customs] and other officers of Customs shall have the same powers in respect
of such articles of food as they have for the time being in respect of such
goods as aforesaid.
(2) Without prejudice to the provisions of
sub-section (1) the 2[Commissioner of
Customs], or any officer of the Government authorised by the Central Government
in this behalf, may detain any imported package which he suspects to contain
any article of food the import of' which is prohibited under Sec. 5 of this
Act, and shall forthwith report such detention to the Director of the Central
Food Laboratory and, if required by him, forward the package or send samples of
any suspected articles of food found therein to the said Laboratory.
1. The said Act has been
repealed by the Customs Act, 1962 {52 of 1962}, Sec. 160 and Schedule.
2. Subs. by Act 22 of
1995. Sec. 87.
7. Prohibitions of manufacture, sale, etc. of certain articles
of food. -No person shall himself or by
any person on his behalf manufacture for sale, or store, sell or distribute-
(i) Any adulterated food:
(ii) Any misbranded food.
(iii) Any article of food for the sale of which
a licence is prescribed, except in accordance with the conditions or the
licence;
(iv) Any article of food the sale of which is for
the time being prohibited by the Food (Health) Authority 1[in the interest of public health;] 2[* * *]
(v) Any article of food in contravention of any
other provision of' this Act or of any rule made thereunder, 3[or]
1[(vi)
Any adulterant.
Explanation--For the purposes of this section,
a person shall be deemed to store any adulterated food or misbranded food or
any article of' food referred to in Cl. (iii) of- Cl. (ii) if he stores such
food for the manufacture there from of any article of food for sale.]
1.
Subs. by Act 49 of 1964. Sec. 4
for certain words {w.e.f. 1st March 1965).
2.
The words “or” omitted by Act 34
of 1976, Sec. 6 {w.e.f. 1st April, 1976).
5. Subs. by Act 49 of 1964.Sec. 5, for Secs. 8 and 9 (w.e. f. Ist
March, 1965).
1[8. Public
Analysts. -The Central
Government or the State Government may, by notification in the Official
Gazette, appoint such persons as it thinks fit, having the prescribed
qualifications to be public analysts for such local area as may be assigned to
them by the Central Government or the State Government as the case may be.
Provided that no person who
has any financial interest in the manufacture import or sale of any article of
food shall be appointed to be a Public Analyst under this section:
2[Provided further that
different public Analysts may be appointed for
different articles of food].
1. Subs.
by Act 49 of 1964.Sec. 5, for Secs. 8 and 9 (w.e. f. 1st March, 1965).
2. Ins. by Act 34 if 1976, Sec 7(w.e.f. 1st
April, 1976).
(1) The Central Government or
the State Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint such
persons as it thinks fit, leaving the prescribed qualifications to be Food
Inspectors for such local areas as may be assigned to them by the Central
Government or the State Government, as the case may be:
Provided that no person who
has any financial interest in the manufacture import or sale of any article of
food shall be appointed to be a Food Inspector may this section.
(2) Every Food Inspector shall be deemed to
be a public servant within the meaning of Sec. 21 of the Indian Penal Code (45
of 1860), and shall be officially subordinate to such authority as the
Government appointing him, may specify in this behalf].
10. Powers of Food Inspectors. -
(1) A Food Inspector shall have
power-
(a) To take samples of any article of food
from-
(i) Any person selling such article
(ii) Any person who is in the course of
conveying, delivering or preparing to deliver such article to a purchaser or
consignee:
(iii) A consignee after delivery of any such
article to him and
(b) To send such sample for analysis to the
Public Analyst for the local area within which such sample has been taken;
1[(c) With the previous approval of the Local (Health) Authority
having jurisdiction in the local area, concerned, or with the previous approval
of the Food (Health) Authority, to prohibit the sale of- any article of food in
the interest of public health.]
2[Explanation-For the purposes of'
sub-clause (iii) of' Cl. (a), consignee” does not include a person who
purchases or receives any article of food for his own consumption.]
1[(2)
Any Food Inspector may enter and inspect
any place where any article of food is manufactured, or stored for sale, or
stored for the manufacture of any other article of food for sale, or exposed or
exhibited for sale or where any adulterant is manufactured or kept, and take
samples of such article of food or adulterant for analysis:
Provided that no sample of
any article of food, being primary food, shall be taken under this sub-section
if 'it is intended for sale as such food].
(3) Where any sample is taken under Cl. (a)
of sub-section (1) or sub-section (2), its cost calculated at the rate at which
the article is usually sold to the public shall be paid to the person from whom
it is taken.
(4) If any article intended for food appears
to any Food Inspector to be adulterated or misbranded, he may seize and carry
away or keep in the safe custody of the vendor such article in order that it
may be dealt with as hereinafter provided; 2[and
he shall, in either case, take a sample of' such article and submit the same
for analysis to a public analyst):
4[Provided that where the
Food Inspector keeps such article in the safe custody of the vendor he may require
the vendor to execute a bond for a sum of money equal to the value of such
article with one or more securities as the Food Inspector deems fit and the
vendor shall execute the bond accordingly.]
2[(4-A)
Where any article of food seized under sub-section (4) is of a perishable
nature and the local (Health) Authority is satisfied that such article of food
is so deteriorated that it is unfit for human consumption, the said Authority
may, after giving notice in writing to the vendor, cause the same to the
destroyed.]
(5) The
power conferred may this section includes power to break open any package in
which any article of food may be contained or to break open the door of any
premises where any article of food may be kept for sale
5[Provided that the power to
break open the package or door shall be exercised only after the owner or any
other person in charge of the package or, as the ease may be, ill Occupation of
premises, if he is present therein, refuse, to open the package or door on
being called upon to do so, and in either case after recording the reasons for
doing so:]
Provided further that the
Food Inspector shall, in exercising the powers of entry upon, arid inspection
of any place under this section, follow, as far as may be the provisions of the 6[Code
of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974)], relating to the search or inspection
of a place by a police officer executing a search-warrant issued under that
Code.
(6) 7[Any adulterant found in the possession of a
manufacturer or distributor of, or dealer in any article of food or in any of
the premises occupied by him as such] and for the possession of which he is
unable to account to the satisfaction of the Food Inspector [and any books of
account or other documents found in his possession or control and which would
be useful for, or relevant to any investigation of proceeding under this Act,
may be seized by the Food Inspector] and 7[a
sample of such adulterant submitted for analysis to a public analyst :
8[Provided that no such books
of account or other documents shall be seized by the Food Inspector except with
the previous approval of the authority to which he is officially subordinated
(7) Where the Food Inspector takes any action under Cl. (a) of subsection (1),
sub-section (2), sub-section (4) or sub-section (6), he shall 9[call one or more persons to be present at the
time when such action is taken and take his or their signatures].
10[(7-A) Where any books of
account or other documents are seized under subsection (6), the Food Inspector
shall within a period not exceeding thirty days from the date of seizure,
return the same to the person from whom they were seized after copies thereof
or extracts therefrom as certified by that person in such manner as may be
prescribed have been taken:
Provided that where such
person refuses to so certify, and a prosecution has been instituted against him
under this Act, such books of account or other documents shall be returned to
him only after copies thereof or extracts therefrom as certified by the Court
have been taken.
(7-B) When any adulterant is seized under
sub-section (6), the burden of proving that such adulterant is not meant for
purposes of adulteration shall be on the person from whose possession such
adulterant was seized.]
(8) Any Food Inspector may exercise the powers
of a police officer 1[under Sec. 42 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974)] for the purpose of
ascertaining the true name and residence of the person from whom a sample is taken
or an article of food is seized.
(9) Any Food Inspector exercising powers under
this Act or under the rules made thereunder
who-
(a) Vexatiously and without any reasonable
grounds of suspicion seizes any article of food 1[or
adulterant]: or
(b) Commits any other act, to the injury of
any person without having reason to believe that such act is necessary for the
execution of his duty; Shall be guilty of an offence under this Act and shall
be punishable for such offence 11[with
fine which shall not be less than five hundred rupees but which may extend to
one thousand rupees].
1. Vinod Kumar v. State
of Punjab, 1983 Cr. L.J.177 at p. 178 (P. & H.) I see also Hariram v. State
of M.P., 1992 Cr.L.J.2135 at p. 3138 (M.P.) 1993 (1) E.F.R 160 at p. 168 (M.P);
State of U.P. v Hanif. 1992 Cr.L.J. 1429 at {. 1431 (S.C.).
2. Subs. by Act 34 of
1976, Sec. 8 (w.e.f. I st April, 1976)
3. Ins. by ibid.
4. Ins. by Act 49 of 1964, Sec. 6 (w.e.f. Ist March. 1965).
5. Subs. by Act 34 of
1976. Sec. 8, for the first proviso (w.e.f. Ist April 1976).
6. Subs by ibid. for “the
code of Criminal Procedure. 1898” (w.e.f. Ist April 1976).
7. Subs. by 34 of
1976. Sec. 8, for certain words (w.e.f.
Ist April, 1976).
8. Subs. by ibid, for the
former proviso (w.e.f. 1st April, 1976).
9. Subs. by Act of 1964,
Sec. 6. For certain words (w.e.f. 1st March, 1965)
10. Ins. by Act 34 of
1976, Sec. 8 (w.e.f. 1st April, 1976).
11. Sadhram v. State of
M.P.1995 (1) E.F.R. 638 at p. 639 (M.P.).
11.
Procedure
to be followed by Food Inspectors. –
5[(1) When a Food Inspector takes a sample of food for analysis, he
shall-
(a) Give notice in writing then and there of
his intention to have it so analysed to the person from whom he has taken the sample
and to the person, if any whose name, address and other particulars have been
disclosed Sec. 14-A:
(b) Except in special cases provided by rules under this Act,
divide the sample then and there into three part and mark and seal or fasten up
each part in such a manner as its nature permits and take the signature or
thumb impression of the person from whom the sample has been taken in such
place and in such manner as maybe prescribed:
Provided that where such
person refuses to sign or put his thumb impression the Food Inspector shall
call upon one or more witnesses and take his or their signature or thumb
impressions, as the case may be, in lieu of the signature or thumb impression
of such person;
(c) (i) Send
one of the parts for analysis to the public analyst under
Intimation to the Local (Health) Authority: and
(ii) Send
the remaining two parts to the Local (Health) Authority for the purposes of
sub-section (2) of this section of sub
Sections (2-A) and (2-F,) of Sec.13.
.
(2)
Where
the part of the sample sent to the public analyst under sub- clause (i) of Cl.
(c) of' sub-section (1) is lost or damaged, the Local (Health) Authority shall, on a requisition made to it by the public analyst or the Food
Inspector despatch one of the parts of the sample sent to it under sub- clause (ii) of the said C1. (C) To the public
analyst for analysis.]
(3) When
a sample of any article of food 1[or
adulterant] is taken under sub- section (1) or sub-section (2) of Sec. 10. 2[the Food Inspector shall, by the immediately
succeeding working day, send a sample of the article of food or adulterant or
both, as the may be,] in accordance with the rules prescribed for shambling to
the public analyst for the local area concerned.
3[(4) An article of food
seized under- sub-section (4) of
See, 10,'Unless destroyed under sub-section
(4-A) of that section, and any adulterant seized under sub-sections (6) of' the
section, shall be produced before a Magistrate as soon as possible and in any
case not later than seven days after the receipt of the report of the public
analyst].
Provided 4[* * *] that if an application is made to the
Magistrate in this behalf by the person from whom any article of food has been
seized, the Magistrate shall, by order in writing direct the Food Inspector to
produce such article before him within such time as may be specified in
5[(5) If it appears to the Magistrate on taking such evidence as he may deem necessary-
(a) That the article of food produced before him under sub- section
(4) is adulterated or misbranded he may order it-
(i) To be forfeited to the Central Government,
the State Government or the
local authority, as the case may be; or
(ii) To be destroyed at the cost of the owner or
the person from whom it was seized so as to prevent its being used as human
food; or
(iii)
To
be so disposed of' as to prevent its being again exposed for sale or used for
food under its deceptive name; or
(iv) To be returned to the owner, on his
executing a bond with or without sureties, for being sold under its appropriate
name or, where the Magistrate is satisfied that the article of food is capable
of being made to conform to prescribed standards for human consumption after
reprocessing, for being sold after reprocessing under the supervision of such
officer as may be specified in the order;
(b) That the adulterant seized under
sub-section (6) of Sec. 10 and produced before him is apparently of a kind
which may be employed for purposes of adulteration and for the possession of
which the manufacturer, distributor or dealer, as the case may be, is unable to
account satisfactorily, he may order it to be forfeited to the Central
Government, the State Government or the local authority, as the case may be.]
(6)
6[If it appears Io the Magistrate that- any such-
(a) Article of food is not adulterated: or
(b) Adulterant which is purported to be an
adulterant is not an adulterant,
The person from whose
possession the article of food or adulterant was taken] shall be entitled to
have it restored to him and it shall be in the discretion of the Magistrate to
award such person from such fund as the State Government may direct in this
behalf, such compensation not exceeding the actual loss which he has sustained
as the Magistrate may think proper.
STATE AMENDMENT
Maharashtra. – In Sec.11 of the principal Act in sub-section (5), in Cl. (a) for the
words “local authority” the words “State Government” shall be substituted.7
1. Ins. by Act 34 of 1976, Sec.9
(w.e.f. Ist April 1976).
2.
Subs. by ibid., (w.e.f.) Ist
April, 1976).
3.
Subs. by ibid., Sec. 9 (w.e.f. Ist April. 1976), for sub
–section (4) and first proviso.
4. The word “further’’ omitted by ibid.,
Act 34 of 1976. Sec 9 (w.e.f. 1st April 1976).
5. Subs.
by ibid, for the sub- section (5).
6. Subs. by Act 34 of 1976. Sec. 9. for certain words.
7. Vide Maharashtra Act, 1975 (L of 1975)
' published in the Maharashtra Government Gazette. Pt. IV, dated 16th
October. 1975 (w.e.f. 11th April, 1977).
12. Purchaser may have food analysed. - Nothing
contained in this Act shall be held to prevent a purchaser of any article of
food other than a Food Inspector 5[or a
recognised consumer association, whether the purchaser is a member of that
association or not,] from having such article analysed by the public analyst on
payment of such fees as may be prescribed and from receiving from the public
analyst a report of' his analysis:
Provided that 1[such purchaser or recognised consumer
association shall inform the vendor at the time of purchase of his or its
intention] to have such article so analysed provided further that the
provisions of sub-sections (1), (2) and (3) of Sec. 11 shall, as far as may be,
apply to a 2[purchaser of article of food
or recognised consumer association who or which intends] to have such articles
so analysed, as they apply to a Food Inspector who takes sample of food for
analysis:
Provided also that if the
report of the public analyst shows that the article of food is adulterated, the
3[purchaser or recognised consumer
association shall be entitled to get refund of the fees paid by him or it]
under this section.
4[Explanation. -For the purposes of this
section and Sec. 20 recognised “consumer association” means a voluntary
consumer association registered under the Companies Act, 1956 (I of 1956), or
under any other law for the time being in force].
1. Subs. by Act 70 of
1986. Sec. 2, for words “such purchaser
shall inform the vendor at the time of purchase of his intention.”
2. Subs. by Sec. 2, ibid.
For the words purchaser of article. Of food who intends”.
3. Subs. by Sec. 2, ibid.
for the words “purchaser shall be entitled to get refund of the fees paid by
him”.
4. Ins. by Sec. 2. Ibid.
5. Ins. by Act 70 of 1986,
Sec.2 (w.e.f. 1st May, 1987).
13. Report of public analyst. –
1[(1) The public analyst shall
deliver, in such from as may be prescribed. a report to the Local (Health)
Authority of the result of the analysis of any article of food submitted to him
for analvs1s.
(2)
On
receipt of the report of the result of the analysis under subsection (1) to the
effect that the article of food is adulterated the Local (Health) Authority
shall, after the institution of prosecution against persons from whom the
sample of the article of food was taken and the person, if any, whose name,
address and other particulars have been disclosed under Sec. 14-A forward, in
Such manner as may be prescribed, a copy of the report of the result of the
analysis to such person or persons, as the case may be, informing such person
or persons that if it is so desired, either or both of them may make an
application to the Court within a period of ten days from the date of 'receipt
of the copy of the report to get the sample of the article of food kept by the Local
(Health) Authority analysed by the Central Food Laboratory.
(2-A) When an application is made to the Court under
sub-section (2), the Court shall require the Local (Health) Authority to
forward the parts of the sample kept by the said Authority and upon such
requisition being made, the said Authority shall forward the part or parts of
the sample to the Court within a period of five days from the date o receipt of
such requisition.
(2-B) On receipt of the part or parts of the sample
from the Local (Health) Authority under sub-section (2-A), the Court shall
first ascertain that the mark and sea] or fastening as provided in Cl. (b) of
sub-section (1) of Sec. 11 are intact and the signature or thumb impression, as
the ease may be, is not tampered with, and despatch the part
or, as the case 1-nav be, one of the parts of the sample under its own seal to
the Director of the Central Food Laboratory who shall thereupon send a
certificate to the Court in the
prescribed form within one month
from the date of receipt of the part of the sample specifying the result of the
analysis.
(2-C) Where
two parts of 'the sample have been sent to the Court and only one part of- the
sample has been sent by the Court to the Director of the Central Food
Laboratory under subsection (2-B), the Court shall, as soon as practicable,
return the remaining part to the Local (Health) Authority and that Authority
shall destroy that part after the certificate from the Director of the Central
Food Laboratory has been received by the Court:
Provided that where the part
of the sample sent by the Court to Director of the Central Food Laboratory is
lost or damaged, the Court shall require the Local (Health) Authority to
forward the part of the sample, if any, retained by it to the Court and on
receipt thereof the Court shall proceed in the manner provided in
sub-section (2-B).
(2-D) Until the receipt of the certificate of the
result of the analysis from the Director of the Central Food Laboratory, the
Court shall not continue with the proceedings pending before it in relation to
the prosecution.
(2-E) If, after considering the report, if any, of
the Food Inspector or otherwise, the Local (Health) Authority is of the opinion
that the report delivered by the public analyst under sub-section (1) is
erroneous, the said Authority shall forward one of the parts of the sample kept
by it to any other public analyst for analysis and if the report of the result
of the analysis of that part of the sample by that other public analyst is to
the effect that the article of food is adulterated, the provisions of
sub-sections(2) to (2-D)) shall, so far as may be, apply.]
(3) The certificate issued by the Director of
the Central Food Laboratory 2[under
sub-section (2-B) l shall supersede the report given by the public analyst
under subsection (1).
(4) Where a certificate obtained from the
Director of the Central Food Laboratory 2[under sub- section (2-B)] is produced in any proceeding under
this Act or under Sees. 272 to 276 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), it
shall not be necessary in such proceeding to produce any part of the sample of
food taken for analysis.
(5) Any document purporting to be a report
signed by a public analyst, unless it has been superseded under sub-section
(3), or any document purporting to be a certificate signed by the Director of
the Central Food Laboratory, may be used as evidence of the facts stated
therein in any proceeding under this Act or under Sees. 272 to 276 of the
Indian Penal Code:
3[Provided that any document
purporting to be a certificate signed by the Director of the Central Food
Laboratory [not being a certificate with respect to the analysis of the part of
the sample of any article of food referred to in the proviso to sub- section (I
-A) of Sec. 161 shall be final and conclusive evidence of the facts stated
therein.]
4[Explanation-In this section, and in Cl.
(9 of sub-section (1) of Sec. 16, “Director of the Central Food Laboratory”
shall include the officer I or the time being in charge of any Food Laboratory
(by whatever designation he is known) recognised by the Central Government for
the purposes of this section.
1. Subs. by Act 34 of 1976. Sec. 10., for sub-section (1) and (2)
(w.e.f. 1st April 1976).
2. Subs.
by Act 34 of 1976. Sec.10 for under
sub-section(2)” (w.e.f. 1st April 1976).
3.
Subs. by Act 34 of 1976. Sec. 10
for proviso (w .e . f. I st April 1976).
4. Ins. Ibid. (w.e.f. Ist April. 1976).
:
MISCELLANEOUS
1[14. Manufacturers,
distributors, and dealers to give warranty. -No 2[manufacturer or distributor of, or dealer in] any
article of food shall sell such article to any vendor unless lie also gives a
warranty in writing in the prescribed form about the nature and quality of such
article to the vendor:
3[Provided that a bill, cash
memorandum or invoice in respect of the sale of' any article of food given by a
manufacturer or distributor of, or dealer in such article to the vendor thereof
shall be deemed to be a warranty given by such manufacturer, distributor or
dealer under this section]
Explanation-In this section, in
sub-section (2) of Sec. 19 and in Sec. 20-A, the expression “distributor” shall
include a commission agent.
1. Subs.
by Act 49 of
1964. Sec. 14 (w.e.f. Ist March 1965).
2. Subs.
by Act 34 of 1976, Sec, 7 for Sec. (w.e.f.Ist April, 1976).
3.
Ins, by ibid. For the proviso (w.e.f. 1st April 1976).
14-A. Vendor to disclose the name, etc. of the
person from whom the article of food was purchased. --Every vendor of an article of food
shall, if so required, disclose to the Food Inspector the name, address and
other particular of the persons from whom he purchased the article of food.
15. Notification of food poisoning. -1[The Central
Government or the State Government] may, by notification in the Official
Gazette, require medical practitioners carrying on their profession in any
local area specified in the, notification to report all occurrences of food
poisoning coming within their cognizance to such officer as may be specified in
the notification.
1. Subs. by Act 49 of 1964, Sec. 8,for”tlie state
Government” (w.e.f. 1st March 1965).
4[(l) Subject- to the provisions of subsection (I
-A) it any person, -
(a) Whether by himself or by any other person
on his behalf, imports into India or manufactures for sale, or stores, sells or distributes any
article of food—
(i) Which is adulterated within the meaning
of sub- clause (m) of Cl. (i-a) of Sec.
2 or misbranded within the meaning of Cl. (ix) of that section or the sale of'
which is prohibited under any provision of this Act or any rule made thereunder
or by an order of the Food (Health) Authority;
(ii) Other
than an article of food referred to in sub-clause (i), in contravention
of any of the provisions of this Act or of any rule made thereunder; or
(b) Whether by himself or may any other person
on his behalf, imports into India or manufactures for sale, or stores, sells or
distributes any adulterant which is not injurious to health; or
(c) Prevents a Food Inspector from taking a
sample as authorised by this Act: or
(d) Prevents a Food Inspector from exercising
any other power conferred on him by or under this Act: or
(e) Being a manufacturer of an article of
food, has in his possession, or in any of- the premises occupied by him, any adulterant which is not injurious to health; or
(f)
Uses
any report or certificate of a test or analysis made by the Director of the
Central Food Laboratory or by a public analyst or any extent thereof for the
purpose of 'advertising any article of food; or
(g) Whether by himself or by any other person
on his behalf, gives to the vendor, a false warranty in writing in respect of
any article of food sold by him, he shall, in addition to the penalty to which
he may be liable under the provisions of Sec. 6, be punishable with
imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than six months but which may
extend to three years, and with fine which shall not be less than one thousand
rupees;
Provided
that-
(i) If the offence is under sub-clause (i) of
Cl. (a) and is with respect to an article of food, being primary food which is
adulterated due to human agency or is with respect to an article of food which is
misbranded within the meaning of sub-clause (k) of Cl. (ix) of Sec. 2or
(ii) If the offence is under sub-section (ii)
of Cl. (a), but not being an offence with respect to the contravention of any
rule made under Cl. (a) or Cl. (g) of sub-section (I-A) of See. 23 or under Cl.
(b) of sub-section (2) of See 24, the Court may, for any adequate and special
reasons to be mentioned in the judgment, impose a sentence of imprisonment for
a term which shall not be less than three months but which may extend to two
years, and with fine which shall not be less than five hundred rupees:
Provided further that if
offence is under sub-clause (ii) of Cl. (a) and is with respect to the
contravention of any rule made under Cl. (a) or Cl. (g) of sub-section (I -A)
of Sec. 23 or under Cl. (b) of sub-section (2) of Sec. 24, the Court may, for
any adequate and special reasons to be mentioned in the judgment, impose a
sentence of imprisonment for a term which may extend to three months and with
fine which may extend to five hundred rupees.]
1[(I-A) If any
person whether by himself or by any other person on his behalf, imports into
India or manufactures for sale, or stores, sells or distributes, -
(i) Any article of food which is adulterated
within the meaning of any of sub- clausess (e) to (1) (both inclusive) of Cl.
(i-a) of Sec. 2; or
(ii) Any adulterant which is injurious in
addition to the penalty to which he may be liable under the provisions of
Sec.6, be punishable with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than
one year but which may extend to six
years and with fine which shall not be less than two thousand rupees:
Provided that if such
article of food or adulterant when consumed by any person is likely to cause his death or is likely to cause such
harm on his body as would amount to grievous hurt within the meaning of Sec.
320 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), he shall be punishable with.
Imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than three years but which may
extend to term of life and with line which shall not be less than five thousand
rupees.]
2[(1-AA) If any person in whose safe, custody any
article of food has been kept under sub-section (4) of Sec. 10, tampers or in
any manner interferes with such article, he shall be punishable with
imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than six months but which may
extend to two years and with fine which shall not less than one thousand
rupees.]
3[(l-B) If any Person in whose safe, custody any
article of food has been kept under sub- section (4) of Sec. 10 sell or distribute such article, which is
found by the Magistrate before whom it is produced to be adulterated within the
meaning of sub-clause (h) of Cl. (i-a) of Sec. 2 and which, when consumed by
any person, is likely to cause his death or is likely to cause such harm on his
body as would amount to grievous hurt within the meaning of Sec. 320 of the
Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), then, notwithstanding anything contained in
sub-section (I-AA), he shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which
shall not be less than three years but which may extend to term of life and
with fine which shall not be less than five thousand rupees.]
(I-C) If any person contravenes the provisions of
Sec. 14 or Sec. 14-A, he shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term,
which may extend to six months and with fine, which shall not be less than five
hundred rupees.
(I -D) If any
person convicted of an offence under this Act commits a like offence
afterwards, then, without prejudice to the provisions of' sub-section (2), the
Court, before which the second or subsequent conviction takes place, may order
the cancellation of the licence, if any, granted to him under this Act and
thereupon. such licence shall, notwithstanding anything contained in this Act
or in the rules made thereunder, stand cancelled.
(2) If any person convicted of an offence
under this Act commits a like offence afterwards it shall be lawful for the
Court before which the second or subsequent conviction takes place to cause the
offender's name and place of residence, the offence and the penalty imposed to
be published at the offender's expense in such newspapers or in such other
manner as the Court may direct. The
expenses of such publication shall be deemed to be part of the cost attending
the conviction and shall be recoverable in the same manner- as a fine.
STATE AMENDMENT
West Bengal. -In Se. 16. -
(a) In sub-section (1),,for the words “a term which shall riot be less their? Six
months but which may extend to six year. And with fine which shall not be less
than one thousand rupees.” The world “ life and shall also be liable to fine”
shall be substituted:
(b) In the proviso to sub-section (1) for the
worlds “ the Court may for any adequate and special reasons to be mentioned in
the judgment. Impose a sentence of imprisonment for a term of less than six
months and fine of less than one thousand rupees”. The following words shall be substituted namely:
“If the Court thinks that
for any adequate and special reasons to be mentioned in the judgment a lesser sentence would serve the end of justice. The
judgment the Court may impose a sentence which is less than a sentence of
imprisonment for life.”
In subsection
(I-B), for the words “a term of six year and with fine which shall not be less
than one thousand rupee.” the words “life and shall also be liable to fine”
shall be substituted.5
1. Ins. by Act 34 of
1976. Sec. 12 (w.e.f.Ist April 1976).
2. Sub-section (1-A)
renumbered (as sub- section I-AA) by
Sec. 12 of the Act 34 of 1976 (w.e.f. 1st April. 1976).
3. Subs. by ibid. For
sub-section (1-B) (w.e.f.1 st April.
1976).
4. Subs. Act 34 of 1976, Sec. 12 (w.e.f. Ist April 1976);
5. Vide the West Bengal Act (XLIIof-1973)
published in the Calcutta Gazette. Pt.11I No. 267. dated 29th April 1974.
1[16-A. Power of Court to try cases summarily. -Notwithstanding anything
contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), all offences
under subsection (1) of Sec. 16 shall be tried in a summary way by a Judicial
Magistrate of the first class specially empowered in this behalf by the State
Government or by a Metropolitan Magistrate and the provisions of Secs. 262 to
265 (both inclusive) of the said Code shall, as far is may be, apply to such
trial:
Provided that in the ease of
any conviction in a summary trial under this section, it shall be lawful for
the Magistrate to pass a sentence of imprisonment for a term not exceeding one
year:
Provided further that when
at the commencement of, or in the course of a summary trial may this
section, it appears to the Magistrate that the nature of the case is such that
a sentence Of imprisonment for a term exceeding one year may have to be passed
or that it is, for any other reason, undesirable to try the case summarily, the
Magistrate shall after hearing the parties, record an order to that effect and
thereafter recall any witness who may have been examined and proceed to hear or
rehear the case in the manner provided by the said Code.]
1. Ins. by Act 34 of 1976, Sec. 13 (w.e.f.
lst April, 1976).
1[17. Offences by companies. –
(1) Where an offence under this Act
has been committed by a company-
(a) (i) The
person, if any, has been nominated under sub-section (2) to be in charge of,
and responsible to the company for the conduct of the business of the company
(hereafter in this section referred to as the person responsible), or
(ii) Where
no person has been so nominated, every person who at the time the offence was
committed was in charge of and was responsible to the company for the conduct
of the business of the company; and
(b) The company shall be deemed to be guilty
of the offence and shall be liable to be proceeded against and punished
accordingly:
Provided that nothing
contained in this sub-section shall render any such person liable to any
punishment provided in this Act if he proves that the offence was committed
without his knowledge and that he exercised all due diligence to prevent the
commission of such offence.
(2) Any company may, by order in writing,
authorise any of its directors or managers (such manager being employed mainly
in a managerial or supervisory capacity) to exercise all such powers and take
all such steps as may be necessary or expedient to prevent the commission by
the company of any offence under this Act and may give notice to the Local
(Health) Authority, in such form and in such manner as may be prescribed, that
it has nominated such director or manager as the person responsible, along with
the written consent of such director or manager for being so nominated.
Explanation-Where a company has
different establishments or branches or different units in any establishment or
branch, different persons may be nominated under this sub-section in relation
to different establishments or branches or units and the person nominated in
relation to any establishment, branch or unit shall be deemed to be the person
responsible in respect of such establishment, branch or unit.
(3)
The person nominated under sub-section
(2) shall, until-
(i) Further notice cancelling such
nomination is received from the company by the Local (Health) Authority; or
(ii) He ceases to be a director or, as the case
may be, manager of the company: or
(iii) He makes a request in writing to the
Local (Health) Authority, under intimation to the company, to cancel the
nomination [which request shall be complied with by the Local (Health)
Authority], whichever is the earliest, continue to be the person responsible:
Provided that where such
person ceases to be a director or, as the case may be, manager of the company,
he shall intimate the fact of' such cesser to the Local (Health) Authority:
Provided further that where
such person makes a request under Cl. (iii) the Local (Health) Authority shall
not cancel such nomination with effect from a date earlier than the date on
which the request is made.
(4) Notwithstanding anything contained in the
foregoing sub-sections, where an offence under this Act has been committed by a
company and it is proved that the offence has been committed with the consent
or connivance of or is attributable to, any neglect on the part of, any
director, manager, secretary or other officer of the company not being a person
nominated may subsection (2), such director, manager, secretary or other
officer shall also be deemed to be guilty of that offence and shall be liable
to be proceeded against and punished accordingly.
Explanation-For the purposes of this
section, -
(a) “Company” means any body corporate and
includes a firm or other association of individuals:
(b) “Director”, in relation to a firm, means a partner in the firm;
and
(c) “Manager” in relation to a company engaged
in hotel industry, includes the person in charge of the catering department of
any hotel managed or run by it. 1
1. Subs.
by Act 34 of 1976. Sec. 14, for Sec. 17
(w.e.f. 1st April 1976).
18. Forfeiture of
property. -Where any
person has been convicted under this Act for the contravention of any of the
provisions of this Act or of any rule there under, the article of food in
respect of which the contravention has been committed may be forfeited to the
Government.
1[Provided that where the
Court is satisfied that the article of food is capable of being made to conform
to prescribed standards for human consumption after reprocessing, the Court may
order the article of food to be returned to the owner, on his executing a bond
with or without sureties, i or being sold, subject to the other provisions of
this Act, after reprocessing under the supervision of such officer as may be
specified therein.
1.
Ins by Act 34 of 1976, Sec. 15
(w.e.f'. I St April 1976).
19. Defences, which may or may not be allowed in prosecutions under this Act. -
(1) It shall be no defence in a
prosecution for an offence pertaining to the sale of any Adulterated or
misbranded article of food to allege merely that the vendor was ignorant of the
nature, substance or quality of the food sold by him or that the purchaser
having purchased any article for analysis was not prejudiced by the sale.
1(2)
A vendor shall not be deemed to have
committed an offence pertaining to the sale of any adulterated or misbranded
article of food if lie proves-,
(a) That he purchased the article of food--
(i) In a case where a licence is prescribed
for the sale thereof, from a daily licensed manufacturer, distributor or
dealer;
(ii) In any other case, from any manufacturer,
distributor or dealer, with a written warranty in the prescribed form; and
(b) That the article of food while in his
possession was property stored and
That he sold it in the same State
as he purchased it.]
(3) Any person by whom a warranty as is
referred to, 2[in Sec-. 14] is alleged to
have been given shall be entitled to appear at the hearing and give evidence.
STATE
AMENDMENTS
Uttar Pradesh. –After Sec. 19, the
Allowing section shall be inserted namely:
“19A.Burden of
proof. --. When any article intended for food is seized from
any person under sub-section (4) of 'Sec I 0 by a Food inspector in the
reasonable belief that the same is adulterated or misbranded, the burden of
proving that Such article intended for food is not adulterated or. Misbranded
shall be on the person from whose possess such article intended for food was
seized. “3
West Bengal. -After Sec. 19. The
following section shall be inserted, namely: Burden of –proof. -When any
article intended for food is seized from any person in the reasonable belief
that the same is adulterated or misbranded the burden of proving that such article intended for food is not
adulterated or misbranded shall be on the person from whose possession such
article intended for food was seized.4
1. Subs. by Act 49 of 1964, Sec. 10
(w.e.f. 1st March 1965).
2. Subs. by ibid., for the words “in
sub-section (2)” (w.e.f. 1st March 1965).
3. Vide
the Prevention of Adulterated of Food, Drugs and Cosmetics (Uttar Pradesh Amendment) Act. 1974 (U.P.
Act No- 47 of 1975) (w.e f. 15th Decernber, 1975).
4. Vide the West Bengal Act XLII of 1973.
Published in the Calcutta Gazette, Pt. 111, No. 267, dated 29th April, 19,14
(w.e.f. 29th April, 1974).
20. Cognizance and trial of offences. –
1[(1) No prosecution for an offence under this Act, not being an offence
under this Sec. 14 or Sec. 14-A] shall be instituted except by, or with the
written consent of, 2[the Central Government or the State Government 3[***] or a person
authorised in this behalf by general or special order, by the Central
Government or the State Government .2[***]:
Provided that a prosecution
for an offence under this Act may be instituted by a purchaser 4[or recognised consumer association] referred
instituted to in Sec. 12 5[if he or it
produces] in Court a copy of the report of the public analyst along
with the complaint.
6[(2)
No Court interior to that of Metropolitan Magistrate or a, Judicial Magistrate
of the first class shall try any
offence under this Act.
(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in the
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), an offence, punishable under
sub-section (I -AA) of Sec. 16 shall be cognizable and non-bailable.]
STATE AMENDMENT
West Bengal. -For Sec. 20, the following
section shall be inserted, namely:”20.
Cognizance of offences and arrest without warrant. -(1) All offences
punishable under this Act shall be cognizable and non-bailable.
(2) Any police officer not below the rank of a
Sub- Inspector of police may arrest without warrant any person against whom a
reasonable complaint has been made or credible information has been received 0f
his having been concerned in any of the offences punishable under this Act.”7
1. Subs. by Act 34 of
1976, Sec. 16 (w.e.f. Ist, April 1976).
2. Subs by Act 49 to
1964, Sec. 17 for certain words (w.e.f.
1st March 1965).
3. The words “or a local
Authority” emitted by Act 34 oi'1976, Sec. 16 I-or certain words (w.e.f. Ist April 1976).
4. Ins. by Act 70 of 1986,
Sec. 3 (a) (w.e.f.Ist May, 1987).
5. Subs. by sec. 3 (b),
ibid. (w.e.f. Ist May, for the words “if he produces”.
6. Subs. by Act 34 of 1976, sec. 16
7. Vide the west Bangal
Act (XLII of 1973), published in the Calcutta Gazette, pt. III. No.267, dated
29th April , 1974 (w.e.f.29th April, 1974).
1[20- A. Power of Court to implead
manufacturers, etc.-Where at any time during the
trial of any offence under this Act alleged to have been committed by any person,
not being the manufacturer, distributor or dealer of any article of food, the
Court is satisfied, on the evidence adduced before it, that such manufacturer,
distributor or dealer is also concerned with that offence, then the Court may,
notwithstanding anything contained in 2[sub-section
(3) of Sec. 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974)], or in
Sec. 20 proceed against him as though a prosecution had been instituted against
him under Sec. 20.]
1. Ins. by Act 49 of
1964, Sec. 12 (w.e.f. 1 st March, 1965).
2. Subs. by Act 34 of
1976, Sec. 17, for certain words (w.e.f. 1st April. 1976).
1[20-AA. Application of the Probation of Offenders
Act, 1958 and Sec. 360 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973-Nothing
contained in the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 (20 of 1958), or Sec. 360 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), shall apply to a person
convicted of an offence may this Act unless that person is under eighteen years
of age.
1. Ins. by Act 34 of 1976. Sec. 18 (w.e.f.
1st April, 1976).
1[21. Magistrate's
power to impose enhanced penalties. -Not-withstanding anything
contained in Sec. 29 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), it
shall be lawful for any Metropolitan Magistrate or any Judicial Magistrate of
the first class to pass any sentence authorised by this Act, except a sentence
of imprisonment for life or for a term exceeding six years, in excess of his
powers under the said section.]
1. Subs. by Act 34
of 1976. sec. 19 (w.e.f. 1st April 1976).
22. Protection of action taken in good faith. -No suit, prosecution or other legal proceedings shall lie against any
person for anything which is in good faith done or intended to be done under
this Act.
1[22-A. Power of Central Government to give
directions. -The Central Government may
give such directions as it may deem necessary to a State Government regarding
the carrying into execution of all or any of the provisions of this Act and the
State Government shall comply with such directions.]
1. Ins. by Act 34 of-
1976. Sec. 20 (w.e.f. 1 st April,
1976).
23. Power of the Central Government to make rules. -
1(l) The Central Government may,
after consultation with the Committee and after previous publication by
notification in the Official Gazette, make rules to carry out the provisions of
'this Act:
Provided that
consultation with the Committee may be dispensed with if the Central Government
is of the opinion that circumstances have arisen which render it necessary to
make rules without such consultation, but in such a case, the Committee shall
be consulted within six months of the making of the rules and the Central
Government shall take into consideration any suggestions which the Committee
may make in relation to the amendment, of the said rules.]
2[(I-A) 3[ln
particular arid without particular and without prejudice to the generality of
the foregoing power, such rules may provide lot- all or any of the following
matters, namely:]
(a) Specifying the article of food or classes
of' food for the import of which a licence is required] and prescribing the
form and Conditions of' such licence, the authority empowered to issue the
same, 4[the fees payable therefor, the
deposit of any sum as security for the performance of the conditions of the
licence and the circumstances under which such licence or security may be cancelled
or forfeited]:
(b) Defining the standards of quality for,
and fixing the limits of variability permissible in respect of, any article of
food:
(c) Laying down special provisions for
imposing rigorous control over the production, distribution and sale of any
article or class of articles of food which the Central Government may, by
notification in the Official Gazette, specify in this behalf including registration
of the premises where they are manufactured, maintenance of the premises in a
sanitary condition and maintenance of the healthy state of human beings
associated with the production, distribution and sale of such article or class
or articles;
(d) Restricting the packing and labelling of
any article of food arid the design of any such package or label with a view to
preventing the public or the purchaser being deceived or misled as to the
character, quality or quantity of the article 5[or
to preventing adulteration];
(e) Defining the qualifications, powers and
duties of Food Inspectors and public analyst;
1(ee)
Defining the laboratories where
samples of articles of food or adulterants may be analysed by public analyst
under this Act;]
(f)
Prohibiting the sale or defining the conditions of sale of any substance
which may be injurious to health when used as food or restricting in any manner
its use as an ingredient in the manufacture or sale of any article of food
(g) Defining the conditions of sale or
conditions for licence of sale of any article of food in the interest of public
health
(h) Specifying the manner in which
containers for samples of food purchased for analysis shall be sealed tip or
fastened up
1(hh) Defining the methods of 'analysis:]
(i)
Specifying
a list of permissible preservatives, other than common salt arid sugar, which
alone shall be used in preserved fruits, vegetables, or their products or any
other- article of food as well as the maximum amount of each preservative:
(j) Specifying the colouring matter and the
maximum quantities therefor which may be used in any article of food;
(k) Providing for exemption from this Act or
of any requirements contained there and subject to such condition, if any as may
be Specified of any article or class of articles of food;
(l) Prohibiting or
regulating the manufacture, transport or sale of any article known to be used
as an adulterant of food;
(m) Prohibiting or
regulating-
(i) The addition of any
water, or other diligent or adulterant to any article of food;
(ii)
The
abstraction of-any ingredient from any article of food
(iii)
The
sale of any article of food to which such addition or from which such
abstraction has been made or which has been otherwise artificially treated;
(iv) The mixing of two or
more articles of food which are similar in nature or appearance,
(n) Providing for the
destruction of such articles of food as are not in accordance with the
provisions of this Act or of the rules made thereunder.
6[(2) Every rule made by the Central Government under this Act shall be
laid as soon as may be after it is made before each House of Parliament while
it is in session for a total period of thirty days 2[which may be comprised in
one session or in two or more successive sessions, and
it' ' before the expiry of 'the session immediately following the session or
the successive sessions aforesaid] both Houses agree in making any modification
in the rule or both Houses agree
that the rule should not be made, the rule shall thereafter have effect only in
such modified form or be of no
effect as the case may be: so, however, that any such modification or annulment
shall be without prejudice to the validity of anything previously done under
that rule.]
1. Ins. by Act 34 of 1976,
Sec. 21 (w.e.f. 1st April 1976).
2. Remunerated by Act 34
of 1976, Sec. 21 (w.e.f. 1st April 1976).
3. Subs. by ibid, for
certain words (w.e.f.Ist April, 1976).
4. Subs. by Act 49 of 1964,
Sec.13. for the words and fees payable therefor” (w.e.f. 1st March, 1965).
5. Ins. by Act 34 of 1976, Sec. 21 (w.e.f. 1st April
1976).
6. Subs. by Act 49 of
19b4. NCC. 13 (w.e.f. lst March, 1965).
24. Power of the State Government to make rules. -
(1) The State Government may, after
consultation with Committee and subject to the condition of previous
publication, make rules for the purpose of giving effect to the provisions of
this Act in matters not falling within the purview of Sec. 23.
(2) In particular, and without prejudice to
the generality of the foregoing power, such rules may-
(a)
Define
the powers and duties of the Food (Health) Authority, 1[local authority and Local (Health) Authority
under this Act
2[* * *]:
(b) Prescribe the forms of licences for the
manufacture for sale, for the storage, for the sale and for the distribution of
articles of food or any specified article of food or class of articles of food,
the form of' application for such licences the conditions subject to which such
licences may be issued, the authority empowered to issue the same, 3[the fees
payable therefor], the deposit of any sum as security for the performance of
the conditions of the licences and the circumstances under which such licences
or security 4[may be suspended, cancelled
or forfeited]:
(c) Direct a fee to be paid for analysing any
article of food or for any matter, for which a fee may be prescribed under this
Act,
(d) Direct that the whole or any part of the
fines imposed under this Act shall be paid to a local authority on realization;
(e) Provide for the delegation of the powers
and functions conferred by this Act on the State Government or the Food
(Health) Authority to subordinate authorities or to local authorities.
(3) All rules made by the State Government may
this Act, shall, as soon as possible after they are made, be laid before the
respective State legislatures.
STATE
AMENDMENT
Maharashtra. -In Sec. 24 o the principal Act,
in sub -section (2), in Cl. (d) for the words
“shall be paid to a local authority on realization”, the words “shall,
on realization, be paid either to ct local authority. Or officer of the State
Government is appointed, as the local authority, be credited to the
Consolidated fund of the State” shall
be substituted5.
1. Subs. by Act 34 of
1976, Sec. 22, for “and local authority”.
2. Certain words omitted
by Act 49 of 1964, Sec. 14 (w.e.f. Ist March 1965).
3. Subs. by ibid. for the
words “and the fees payable therefor”.
4. Subs. by Act 34 of
1976, Sec. 22, for the words “may be cancelled for forfeited” (w.e.f. Ist April
1976),
5. Vide Maharashtra Act
(I of 1975) published in the Maharashtra Government Gazette, Pt. IV, dated the
16th October 1975 (w.e.f. 11th April 1977).
(1) If immediately before the
commencement of this Act, there is in force in any State to which this Act
extends any law Corresponding to this Act, that corresponding law shall upon
such commencement stand repealed.
(2) Notwithstanding the repeal by this Act
of any corresponding law, all rules, regulations and bye-laws relating to the
prevention of adulteration of food made under such corresponding law and in
force immediately before the commencement of this Act shall, except where and
so far as they are inconsistent with or repugnant to the provisions of this
Act, continue in force until altered, amended or repealed by rules made under
this Act.1
1. In its application to
the State of Jammu and Kashmir in Sec. 25 after sub-section (2), the following
sub-section shall be inserted, namely:
“(3) (a) Reference to the commencement of this Act in this section shall be construed as reference to the commencement of the Prevention of Food Adultration (Amendment) Act, 1971.
(b) For the avoidance of doubt, it is hereby
declared that provisions of sub-sections (2) shall be without prejudice to the
provisions contained in Sec. 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 (10 of 1897),
which shall also apply to the repeal of the corresponding law in force in the
state of Jammu and Kashmir as if such corresponding law had been an enactment”.